The Judith Regan $100 Million Lawsuit: What's It All About?
Posted on November 21, 2007
The New York Observer takes a look at the claims made by fired uber-publisher Judith Regan in her $100 million lawsuit against News Corp and Jane Friedman, the CEO of HarperCollins. The lawsuit alleges that there was a conspiracy to fire her because she knew incriminating things about Rudy Guiliani which could hurt his presidential aspirations. Judith, as you may recall, had a torrid fling with Bernie Kerik who was police commissioner of New York City and is very close to Mayor Guiliani. Kerik was just indicted on tax charges.
The lawsuit is a humdinger, with all kinds of shocking allegations and a who's who list of potential witnesses. The suit alleges defamation, breach of contract, and sex discrimination.
Most spectacularly, the lawsuit alleges that Ms. Regan was the victim of a vast conspiracy, set in motion by two unnamed News Corp executives, who were worried that she would expose secrets about her now-indicted former lover Bernard Kerik-the former New York City police commissioner-that would imperil his former boss Rudy Giuliani's presidential bid. News Corp conspired to not only fire her, according to the lawsuit, but also defame her and discredit her so that any allegations she made would be immediately discounted as the ravings of a crazy person.Some commentators have ridiculed Judith Regan while others think that there really is something to her charges. The fact that she was offered $6 million before she even filed suit says something. There will be at least one other settlement offer after News Corp sees some of her evidence in discovery. And if Judith really has the goods, that is going to be a big number. The Observer says a News Corp spokeswoman called the suit "preposterous."***
According to a source close to Ms. Regan and familiar with the negotiations, she was offered a $6.5 million settlement in August but turned it down. Bertram Fields, Ms. Regan's lawyer (though he is not directly representing her in the case) told The Observer last week: "We told them their number was unacceptable. They were warned in advance that she was going to file if they didn't increase the settlement offer they'd made and they responded that they were not going to increase it by one dime. And as a result she filed."